For our context, the key phrase in Wood’s definition is “economically strong.” According to Wood, this means applications would be safe for very large financial transactions.
The Web3 Foundation funds “research and development teams who are building the foundation of the decentralized web.”
Web3 is not the “read-write-execute” web that pioneers imagined. It is instead the “read-write-truth” web.
When someone types in a website address, authorities ensure that person ends up at the right site. Someone using Facebook trusts the company to store and share personal information. Someone shopping online must trust the merchants, payment processors, and protocol managers. Folks banking online trust multiple authorities.
All of this is theoretical for now. But web3 and associated cryptocurrencies might open the door for new forms of large-scale ecommerce and everyday transactions.
“Software such as Facebook or Twitter is not so economically strong…you wouldn’t want to transact agreements worth hundreds of millions of dollars over Facebook,” said Wood.
- The internet describes the protocols and physical connections between computers. It is the “wire and the network.”
- Web 1.0 facilitated the sharing of static files and information — the “read-only” web.
- Web 2.0 added interactivity and social media. It allowed just about anyone to create and share content. Web2 is what we use now for everything from Facebook to ecommerce. It is the “read-write” web.
- Web 3.0 is a software framework that reimagines web applications in a way that dilutes authority, verifies identity and intent, and builds a better, more sustainable set of tools for everyone to share and use, or so its proponents argue.
Juan Benet, CEO of Protocol Labs, addressed this evolution in four steps.
Truth, not Trust
It decentralizes applications in much the same way that cryptocurrencies decentralize money.
The internet’s origins date back to the 1960s, when it was largely an academic and military project. Today, the web is interactive and social. Web3 proposes a new future for this now vital technology.
Given this rise in interest, the trending web3 concept may be an idea ecommerce business owners and managers should understand.
- App developers unwittingly exposed more than 100 million Android users’ personal information.
- Hackers scraped and disclosed the personal info of some 553 million Facebook users.
- LinkedIn lost control of 700 million user records, releasing full names, phone numbers, physical locations, geolocation data, and more.
The problem with this arrangement is that these authorities and security protocols are not always trustworthy. Here are some examples from 2021.
The concept of a decentralized web could lead to new forms of ecommerce.
In a sense, web3 is meant to be a panacea for the security, privacy, and trust issues in the current interactive and social web.
Today, web2 applications rely on centralized, trusted authorities and a handful of trusted security protocols. Everyone using the internet must trust governments and private organizations. This requires trusting both intent and action.
Google Trends shows an increase in search queries for “web3” in recent months.
Web3 — sometimes called web 3.0 — is a popular buzzword. Queries on Google for the phrase peaked in early December, with search volume about 20 times that of just a year before.
If widely adopted, web3 may facilitate large and robust ecommerce transactions valued at hundreds of millions of dollars.
At the million level, web2 ecommerce authorities are just not trustworthy enough. The parties involved would, instead, trust the legal jurisdiction where the contracts are recorded to ensure performance as promised.
Such privacy worries have prompted significant changes in data collection laws worldwide and impacted how online advertising works across devices.
But not yet. Web3 has garnered interest, but it has yet to produce the effects that Wood describes. What’s more, almost no one imagines that web3 will replace web2. Rather, both will live side-by-side for years.
Today someone might make an online payment of several thousand dollars without much thought. But two companies closing a million deal would involve lawyers and contracts.
In short, web2 apps require trust but don’t always merit it. In contrast, web3 is trustless. The web3 framework assumes no individual or organization is trustworthy, so it verifies identity and intent every time.
“Web3 is an extensible framework for creating massively multi-user, economically strong applications,” said Wood. It is also a “reliable, robust means of helping [an] application stay useful in adverse conditions.”